Minimalism and the Death of Detail

In the article titled “Minimalism and the Death of Detail,” The Harvard Crimson explores the ongoing debate between minimalist and maximalist design. Some argue that minimalist design removes character, while others contend that its impact lies in leaving room for audience interpretation. The tension between simplicity and intricate detailing continues to shape architectural aesthetics and our perception of spaces. While both types of design have their advantages, the use of minimalism specifically in cities and towns seems to starve the location of culture and individuality. Many objects, such as park benches, telephone booths, street lights, and even fences and gates, were also historically designed in an incredibly detailed and complex manner. Now, many of these objects are intentionally created to look as simple as possible with no decoration. When objects are decorated, it might make the viewer feel as though they are looking at something that someone put a lot of effort into making, and therefore the viewer might value it more. When decorated objects are used by cities to adorn streets and buildings, the public might feel as though their city cares for them and the space that they live in, as there has been an effort to make it beautiful and unique, enhancing their location and culture. A city's look or feel relies heavily on the little details put into the design of public areas, as viewers notice and appreciate it. When a city or town uses strictly minimal designs, the area can begin to feel lifeless and uniform.

Read more in the following article: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/10/15/minimalism-maximalism-design-detail/